07.25.03 * We all know that Stop Motion in the past & present has usually been screwed and never really given a chance in mainstream. This article No-more-pencils animation reveals Disney's desperation and are abandoning much of their roots, "hand drawn animation". Welcome to the club all you traditional 2-D people. Now you know how us micro-scopic group of stop motion aficianados feel like. I say this with a little sarcasm. Article mostly talks about mainstream animation, which is kind of homogenized and they all tend to copy each other. I would think other animation styles should hopefully continue in the independent or other markets. * This
USA article, IBM makes play for 'next-generation
Pixar' discloses
that IBM is also jumping on the CGI
bandwagon. More synthetic visual eye candy being
dumped onto the masses. I wonder how much more saturation
will continue? Not everything that is CGI will necesarily
be a hit. I know that is what the studio suits
might myopically think. IBM in association with Threshold , will be producing an all CGI feature
called Food Fight. Here's their PR
hype, "one of the most complex digitally
animated feature films ever produced," with 138 main
characters, 6,254 secondary characters and 174
sets". Front office "suits" thinks
CGI complexity is the answer? I say .... very stupid
rationalization. Maybe they are forgetting about
good story & characters? 07.18.03 07.16.03 Well, this
is a breath of good news! In the past, Will
Vinton Studios use to be big in Stop Motion but
unfortunately that is no longer. Stop Motion production
in USA for now, seems to be in hibernation. In some of my
previous comments here and on the SMA message boards, I always had a feeling Stop
Motion resurgence or comeback might possibly originate
now, from outside the USA . Studios
here too addicted to CGI and I do not think it
is necessarily because the audience supposedly "only
wants" computer generated products, but maybe
because the public is not being given any other
choice or options. Thankfully, our neighbors in
Canada are carrying-on the Stop Motion
Torch and perhaps they will inspire the
mainstream "Studio Suits" here. 07.11.03 * Well, I
saw the Hulk movie. I liked the
story because it goes into the origins/ birth of
the Hulk and had a dark tone to it. I do
not know how well it did at the box office and IMO, that
should not necessarily be an indicator of a so-called good
movie. Only the money grubbing mainstream
Hollywood suits seem to be concern with opening box
office ticket sales. Also, I am not sure if a Hulk sequel
would be successful. Hulk would only be battling other
super power villans (kind of predictable or dull maybe).
I am guessing, because Hulk was directed by Ang
Lee, he has a different artistic style
or sensibilities than Hollywood indoctrinated
directors. In Hulk, Ang Lee almost had NO funny jokes or
one liners that are typical sometimes of mainstream
Hollywood films. The characters in Hulk were usually
played serious and with slight exaggeration. To me, it
was refreshing without the corny, lame,
or predictable joke one liners but maybe this is why the
pimple faced teenager might not go for the Hulk movie
(more adult theme). As for the CGI / Special Effects, I
have mixed feelings .... the Hulk character actions and
some of the special effects may have went too
extreme and Hulk just defies laws of gravity
& reality and not believable. Here is article about
that The Funny Thing About Animation A new phrase I heard describing
CGI ..... the Hard Cartoon. Some shots
of Hulk do work, especially in the
darker lit scenes where some emotion, feeling & drama
is evoked when Hulk is with the lady character (played by
Jennifer Connelly). As I said in other comments in the
past, CGI to me, is not a reproduction
of true photo-realism with regard to natural or organic
life forms. It might be similar, but I do not really care
about synthesizing reality. Stop Motion,
also cannot represent true reality but more of a surreal
or other-worldly look or feel. In these type of genre
movies, depending on story and context, I think
"photoreal" can be subjective and an
"interpretation". Like Stop Motion, CGI also
has it's own look of surrealness qualities. Again, do
not misinterpret what I am saying .... CGI and
all these digital special effects toys are amazing
& useful tools and enhances the
visual experience for the audience, to a new
level, but maybe a little more restraint or like I have
said before, Less is More might
sometimes be more effective. 07.02.03 * An article from the LA Times regarding studios/producers jumping into the all CGI animated bandwagon just because they (mistakenly) think some of the successful animated features like Finding Nemo and others in the past were because of Computer Animation? That is kind of dumb logic. It is a good article but as usual, Stop Motion is not really out there in current mainstream and it is understandable why usually it's not mentioned much (in the article) but only very, very briefly with reference to Chicken Run . Well worth reading Hunt for Computer Animated Hits * As far
as I know, only a few of announced Stop Motion content
features coming out in mainstream; one not mentioned too
often is The Life Aquatic with Henry
Selick involved on that project. If you go to my
06.11.03 news item, I have some links
about that. Then there is the obviously more well known, Tim
Burton's Corpse Bride. The other one is Aardman's
Tortoise vs. Hare which has been in
"limbo" for awhile and instead, they will be
doing Wallace & Gromit: The Great Vegetable
Plot 1 - 2 which I assume is in production now. All
the information is kind of vague and apparently kept
somewhat secretive. Even on Aardman's website I could not find any information, updates,
or any teasers about W & G movie. Not very good
marketing. Stop Motion needs more publicity! |
||
<< BACK Content in
NEWS is gathered from online, public sources, and from
you ! If you have any tips, info, |
||
|